4.7 Article

Comparing measures of overall and central obesity in relation to cardiometabolic risk factors among US Hispanic/Latino adults

期刊

OBESITY
卷 23, 期 9, 页码 1920-1928

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.21176

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [N01-HC65233]
  2. University of Miami [N01-HC65234]
  3. Albert Einstein College of Medicine [N01-HC65235]
  4. Northwestern University [N01-HC65236]
  5. San Diego State University [N01-HC65237]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveUS Hispanics/Latinos have high prevalence of obesity and related comorbidities. We compared overall and central obesity measures in associations with cardiometabolic outcomes among US Hispanics/Latinos. MethodsMultivariable regression assessed cross-sectional relationships of six obesity measures with cardiometabolic outcomes among 16,415 Hispanics/Latinos aged 18-74 years. ResultsBMI was moderately correlated with waist-to-hip ratio (WHR; women, r=0.37; men, r=0.58) and highly correlated with other obesity measures (r0.87) (P<0.0001). All measures of obesity were correlated with unfavorable levels of glycemic traits, blood pressure, and lipids, with similar r-estimates for each obesity measure (P<0.05). Multivariable-adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) for diabetes (women, 6.7 [3.9, 11.5]; men, 3.9 [2.2, 6.9]), hypertension (women, 2.4 [1.9, 3.1]; men, 2.5 [1.9, 3.4]), and dyslipidemia (women, 2.1 [1.8, 2.4]; men, 2.2 [1.9, 2.6]) were highest for individuals characterized as overweight/obese (BMI25 kg/m(2)) and with abnormal WHR (women 0.85; men, 0.90), compared with those with normal BMI and WHR (P<0.0001). Among normal-weight individuals, abnormal WHR was associated with increased cardiometabolic condition prevalence (P<0.05), particularly diabetes (women, PR=4.0 [2.2, 7.1]; men, PR=3.0 [1.6, 5.7]). ConclusionsObesity measures were associated with cardiometabolic risk factors to a similar degree in US Hispanics/Latinos. WHR is useful to identify individuals with normal BMI at increased cardiometabolic risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据