4.6 Review

Pregnancy diet and associated outcomes in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

期刊

NUTRITION REVIEWS
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 154-174

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuv053

关键词

ALSPAC; childhood diet; diet during pregnancy; FFQ; fish; folate; iodine; iron; magnesium; mercury; n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids; neurocognitive development; potassium

资金

  1. UK Medical Research Council [74882]
  2. Wellcome Trust [092731]
  3. University of Bristol
  4. Wyeth Nutrition
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_15018] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All publications covering diet during pregnancy that stemmed from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children were reviewed. Diet was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. Socioeconomic background, maternal mental health, and the health and development of the offspring were assessed using a variety of methods, such as direct measurement, self-completion questionnaires, and assays of biological samples. Differences in diet, including specific food and nutrient intakes and dietary patterns, were associated with maternal educational attainment, smoking habits, and financial difficulty. There were marginal intakes, compared with recommendations, of the key nutrients iron, magnesium, potassium, and folate. Maternal diet during pregnancy was predictive of offspring diet during childhood. There were independent associations between prenatal fish consumption and lower frequency of maternal depressive and anxiety symptoms, as well as lower frequency of intrauterine growth retardation. Consistent evidence that fish consumption during pregnancy benefited the neurocognitive development of the child was also found. Two constituents of fish, n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and iodine, were associated with these benefits in children. The findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children strengthen the recommendation to eat fish regularly during pregnancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据