4.6 Editorial Material

Impact of metabolic syndrome and C-reactive protein on outcome after coronary stenting

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 383-386

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/BF03345730

关键词

Clinical restenosis; C-reactive protein; inflammation; major adverse clinical events; metabolic syndrome; stent

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metabolic syndrome (MS) identifies cardiovascular risk; however, there is little information regarding the evolution of patients with MS after stent implantation. The aim of this single-center study is to evaluate the possible association between MS and clinical restenosis, after adjustment for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and angiographic predictors of restenosis. In a longitudinal study, 159 patients (89 with and 70 without MS) were studied. Criteria for MS were: elevated blood pressure (systolic >= 130 mmHg, diastolic >= 85 mmHg or drug treatment for hypertension; elevated fasting glucose (>100 mg/dl) or drug treatment for elevated glucose; reduced HDL-cholesterol (<40 mg/dl in men and <50 mg/dl in women) or drug treatment for reduced HDL-cholesterol; elevated triglycerides ( >100 mg/dl) or drug treatment for elevated triglycerides; and obesity (body mass index >28.8 kg/m(2)). The primary end point was the rate of major adverse clinical events (MACE): cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization (TLR) during the 12-month follow-up period. The secondary end point was the rate of TLR. MS was neither identified as predictor of MACE [hazard ratio (HR): 0.844; 95% CI: 0.41-1.74; p=0.648], nor TLR (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.44-2.50; p=0.91), even when controlled for hs-CRP levels and angiographic predictors of restenosis. Also, no significant interaction between MS and hs-CRP was found (p=0.135 and p=0.194, for MACE and TLR, respectively). This study shows that patients with MS do not have an additional risk of MACE, even when controlled for angiographic predictors of restenosis and hs-CRP. (J. Endocrinol. Invest. 32: 383-386, 2009) (C)2009, Editrice Kurtis

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据