4.6 Review

Carbohydrate malabsorption in acutely malnourished children and infants: a systematic review

期刊

NUTRITION REVIEWS
卷 74, 期 1, 页码 48-58

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuv058

关键词

carbohydrate malabsorption; disaccharidase deficiency; F-75; lactose intolerance; malnutrition

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2012-18-005, ACF-2008-18-010] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [MR/M007367/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/M007367/1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) accounts for approximately 1 million child deaths per year. High mortality is linked with comorbidities, such as diarrhea and pneumonia. Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to determine the extent to which carbohydrate malabsorption occurs in children with SAM. Data Sources: The PubMed and Embase databases were searched. Reference lists of selected articles were checked. Data Extraction: All observational and controlled intervention studies involving children with SAM in which direct or indirect measures of carbohydrate absorption were analyzed were eligible for inclusion. A total of 20 articles were selected for this review. Data Synthesis: Most studies reported carbohydrate malabsorption, particularly lactose malabsorption, and suggested an increase in diarrhea and reduced weight gain in children on a lactose-containing diet. As most studies reviewed were observational, there was no conclusive scientific evidence of a causal relationship between lactose malabsorption and a worse clinical outcome among malnourished children. Conclusion: The combined data indicate that carbohydrate malabsorption is prevalent in children with SAM. Additional well-designed intervention studies are needed to determine whether outcomes of SAM complicated by carbohydrate malabsorption could be improved by altering the carbohydrate/lactose content of therapeutic feeds and to elucidate the precise mechanisms involved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据