4.3 Article

SEVERE CHLORATE POISONING SUCCESSFULLY TREATED WITH METHYLENE BLUE

期刊

JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 381-384

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.02.040

关键词

chlorate; methemoglobinemia; methylene blue

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chlorate poisoning as a cause of methemoglobinemia is regarded in current literature to be resistant to treatment by methylene blue due to the oxidizing and denaturing properties of the chlorate anion, and often leads to severe renal and hematological complications with a high mortality rate. Recent case studies suggest practitioners have eschewed the use of methylene blue in such situations. Objectives: This report describes a case of chlorate poisoning presenting as severe methemoglobinemia successfully treated with methylene blue alone, believed to be a first in reported literature. Case Report: A 34-year-old male construction worker presented 4 h after accidental ingestion of an industrial chemical, with giddiness and breathlessness. Physical examination did not reveal any abnormal cardiorespiratory findings, although arterial blood gas analysis and pulse oximetry revealed an oxygen saturation gap.'' Methemoglobin levels were found to be severely elevated at 66.8% 6 h after ingestion, and the patient was promptly treated with methylene blue. Clinical examination and laboratory tests suggested the absence of hemolysis at the time of treatment. The patient was discharged after a brief and uneventful hospital stay. Subsequent tests revealed the chemical ingested to be sodium chlorate. Conclusion: The successful outcome in our case suggests that a window of opportunity as long as 6 h may exist during which treatment of chlorate poisoning with methylene blue may be of clinical value. We postulate that the absence of significant hemolysis and hematological alterations at the time of antidote administration may be a necessary prerequisite for treatment success. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据