4.3 Article

Electrostatic abatement of airborne respirable dust emission from mechanized tree-nut harvesting: Theoretical basis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROSTATICS
卷 67, 期 2-3, 页码 84-88

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.elstat.2009.01.018

关键词

Respirable dust; Air pollution; Charged spray; Electrostatic-induction charging; Bipolar charging; Ionized-field charging; Space-charge field; Electrostatic deposition; Charged-droplet scrubbing; Nuts; Almonds; Walnuts; Pecans

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanized harvesting of tree nuts relies upon mechanically collecting and aerodynamically separating the nuts from extraneous vegetative and soil matter within the orchard using mobile power equipment. Typically the associated high-volume, high-velocity exhaust air disperses into the ambient atmosphere excessive concentrations of respirable-size particulate matter in the PM10 and PM2.5 micrometer realm creating a significant community air-quality problem. Our work developed a cyclonic-separation process for removing the PM10 dust and several candidate electrostatic-abatement processes for the smaller PM2.5 dust. We present the theoretical basis, including relevant mass- and charge-balances, for electrostatically abating the PM2.5 airborne dust via: (a) Ionized-field charging of the dust Plume and its space-charge deposition within adjacent grounded tree-leaf canopies as air velocity subsides; (b) Injection of induct ion-charged spray of like polarity into the ion-charged-dust plume for space-charge-field enhancement; (c) Injection of charged spray alone into the dust plume: and (d) Injection of (+) polarity charged spray into the (-) polarity ionized-field-charged plume for electrostatic wet scrubbing of the dust. In addition to the theoretical basis, we report the technical development of a full-scale prototype to implement these electrostatic-abatement approaches on a mechanical harvester having similar to 10 g/s PM2.5 dust emission at similar to 27 m/s in an similar to 7 m(3)/s exhaust plume. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据