4.5 Article

Effect of Initial Bulk Material Composition on Thermoelectric Properties of Bi2Te3 Thin Films

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
卷 42, 期 7, 页码 1324-1329

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-012-2439-1

关键词

Bi2Te3 thin films; bulk material; stoichiometry; substrate temperature; thermoelectric properties

资金

  1. Ukrainian State Fund for Fundamental Research [UU 42/006 2011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

V2VI3 compounds and solid solutions based on them are known to be the best low-temperature thermoelectric (TE) materials. The predicted possibility of enhancement of the TE figure of merit in two-dimensional (2D) structures has stimulated studies of the properties of these materials in the thin-film state. The goal of the present work is to study the dependences of the Seebeck coefficient S, electrical conductivity sigma, Hall coefficient R (H), charge carrier mobility mu (H), and TE power factor P = S (2) sigma of Bi2Te3 thin films on the composition of the initial bulk material used for preparing them. Thin films with thickness d = 200 nm to 250 nm were grown by thermal evaporation in vacuum of stoichiometric Bi2Te3 crystals (60.0 at.% Te) and of crystals with 62.8 at.% Te onto glass substrates at temperatures T (S) of 320 K to 500 K. It was established that the conductivity type of the initial material is reproduced in films fairly well. For both materials, an increase in T (S) leads to an increase in the thin-film structural perfection, better correspondence between the film composition and that of the initial material, and increase in S, R (H), mu (H), sigma, and P. The room-temperature maximum values of P for the films grown from crystals with 60.0 at.% and 62.8 at.% Te are P = 7.5 x 10(-4) W/K-2 m and 35 x 10(-4) W/K-2 m, respectively. Thus, by using Bi2Te3 crystals with different stoichiometry as initial materials, one can control the conductivity type and TE parameters of the films, applying a simple and low-cost method of thermal evaporation from a single source.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据