4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Development of MBE II-VI Epilayers on GaAs(211)B

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
卷 41, 期 10, 页码 2707-2713

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-012-2218-z

关键词

HgCdTe; gallium arsenide; CdTe; IRFPA; II-VI semiconductors; MBE; large-area substrates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large-area, low-cost substrates are envisioned for next-generation HgCdTe infrared focal-plane arrays (IRFPA). Si, GaAs, Ge, and InSb have been previously examined as potential candidates. Fabrication of IRFPAs based on these substrates is limited by fundamental materials properties that potentially lead to lower detector performance and operability. Lattice and thermal mismatch between the substrate and epilayer are just two of several material factors that must be considered. We have reviewed these factors in the context of more recent data, and determined it worthwhile to revisit the use of GaAs substrates for epitaxial growth of HgCdTe. Our study starts with an evaluation of the surface quality (epireadiness) of commercially available (211) B-oriented GaAs substrates. Molecular beam epitaxial growth of CdTe buffer layers and subsequent HgCdTe absorber layers are performed in separate vacuum-interconnected chambers. The importance of optimization of the CdTe buffer layer growth for high-quality HgCdTe is detailed through surface morphology and x-ray studies. x-Ray diffraction rocking-curve full-width at half-maximum values as low as 52 arcsec have been obtained. Long-wave infrared Hg1-x Cd (x) Te (x = 0.23) has been grown on these buffer layers, producing cross-hatch-dominated surface morphologies, with dislocation densities as low as similar to 3 x 10(6) cm(-2). We have also obtained (for optimized layers), 80-K Hall-effect n-type carrier concentration and electron mobility of approximately similar to 1.5 x 10(15) cm(-3) and 1 x 10(5) cm(2) V-1 s(-1), respectively. Finally, we briefly compare GaAs and Si in light of our preliminary investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据