4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Influence of Pd Concentration on the Interfacial Reaction and Mechanical Reliability of the Ni/Sn-Ag-Cu-xPd System

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 2-10

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-011-1710-1

关键词

Pd concentration effect; Sn-3Ag-0.5Cu; (Cu,Ni)(6)Sn-5; (Pd,Ni)Sn-4; Pd embrittlement; high-speed ball shear (HSBS) test

资金

  1. National Science Council (ROC)
  2. Taiwan Uyemura Co., Ltd. [NSC100-2221-E-155-018-MY3, NSC99-2622-E-155-008-CC3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interfacial reaction between Ni and Sn-3Ag-0.5Cu-xPd alloys (x = 0 wt.% to 1 wt.%) at 250A degrees C and the mechanical reliability of the solder joints were investigated in this study. The reaction and the resulting mechanical properties were both strongly dependent on the Pd concentration. When x was low (a parts per thousand currency sign0.2 wt.%), the reaction product at the Ni/Sn-Ag-Cu-xPd interface was a layer of (Cu,Ni)(6)Sn-5. An increase of x to 0.3 wt.% produced one additional (Pd,Ni)Sn-4 compound that was discontinuously scattered above the (Cu,Ni)(6)Sn-5. When x was relatively high (0.5 wt.% to 1 wt.%), a dual layer of (Pd,Ni)Sn-4-(Cu,Ni)(6)Sn-5 developed with the reaction time. The results of the high-speed ball shear (HSBS) test showed that the mechanical strength of the Ni/Sn-3Ag-0.5Cu-xPd joints degraded with increasing x, especially when x reached a high level of a parts per thousand yen0.3 wt.%. This degradation corresponded to the growth of (Pd,Ni)Sn-4 at the interface, and joints easily failed along the boundaries of solder/(Pd,Ni)Sn-4 and (Pd,Ni)Sn-4/(Cu,Ni)(6)Sn-5 in the HSBS test. The (Pd,Ni)Sn-4-induced joint failure (Pd embrittlement) was alleviated by doping the solder with an appropriate amount of Cu. When the Cu concentration increased to 1 wt.% and the Pd concentration did not exceed 0.5 wt.%, the growth of (Pd,Ni)Sn-4 could be thoroughly inhibited, thereby avoiding the occurrence of Pd embrittlement in the solder joints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据