4.1 Article

Resonant X-ray emission spectroscopy of liquid water: Novel instrumentation, high resolution, and the map approach

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.elspec.2009.02.014

关键词

Water; X-ray emission; High resolution; Hydrogen bonds; X-ray absorption; Liquids

资金

  1. German BMBF [05 KS4WWA/6, 05 KS4VHA/4]
  2. Office of Naval Research
  3. DFG
  4. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Techniques to study the electronic structure of liquids are rare. Most recently, resonant X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES) has been shown to be an extremely versatile spectroscopy to study both occupied and unoccupied electronic states for liquids in thermodynamic equilibrium. However, XES requires high-brilliance soft X-ray synchrotron radiation and poses significant technical challenges to maintain a liquid sample in an ultra-high vacuum environment. Our group has therefore developed and constructed a novel experimental setup for the study of liquids, with the long-term goal of investigating the electronic structure of biological systems in aqueous environments. We have developed a flow-through liquid cell in which the liquid is separated from vacuum by a thin Si3N4 or SiC window and which allows a precise control of temperature. This approach has significant advantages compared to static liquids cells used in the past. Furthermore, we have designed a dedicated high-transmission, high-resolution soft X-ray spectrometer. The high transmission makes it possible to measure complete resonant XES maps in less than an hour, giving unprecedented detailed insight into the electronic structure of the investigated sample. Using this new equipment we have investigated the electronic structure of liquid water. Furthermore, our XES spectra and maps give information about ultra-fast dissociation on the timescale of the O 1s core hole lifetime, which is strongly affected by the initial state hydrogen bonding configuration. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据