4.7 Article

Layered-designed composite sensor based on crown ether/Nafion®/polymer/carbon nanotubes for determination of norepinephrine, paracetamol, tyrosine and ascorbic acid in biological fluids

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 828, 期 -, 页码 11-23

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.09.029

关键词

CNT; Nafion; PEDOT; Crown ether; Norepinephrine; Quaternary separation; Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. Cairo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parkinson's disease is the most common neurodegenerative disorders in human mainly due to insufficient norepinephrine supply. Hence, determination of trace level of norepinephrine (NE) in presence of interfering compounds in biological fluids such as paracetamol (APAP), tyrosine (TR), and ascorbic acid (AA) is essential to diagnosis some psychiatric and neurological disorders diseases. A layer-by-layer stacked composite sensor based on crown ether (crown), Nafion (R) (NF), poly (3-4-ethylene dioxythiophene) (PEDOT) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNT) was fabricated (GC/CNT/PEDOT/NF/Crown). Each component possesses a unique feature that contributes to the remarkable electro-catalytic activity of the sensor. Crown ether allows excellent host-guest recognition and binding ability; NF has good ionic conductivity; PEDOT has high electrical conductivity and stability; and CNT has large surface area and mechanical strength. The proposed sensor was successfully applied for electro-oxidation and separation of quaternary mixture of AA, NE, APAP, and TR into four well-defined peaks with separations in potential (Delta E-p) of: 210, 163 and 257 mV for AA-NE, NE-APAP and APAP-TR, respectively. The separation of these compounds in real human blood serum samples was also successful. Detection limits were 8.46 nmol L-1, 0.0862 nmol L-1, 0.0627 nmol L-1 and 0.429 nmol L-1 in linear dynamic ranges of 0.1-30 mu mol L-1, 0.007-10 mu mol L-1, 0.005-8 mu mol L-1 and 0.06-20 mu mol L-1, for AA, NE, APAP and TR, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据