4.7 Article

Facile one-step synthesis of Ir-Pd bimetallic alloy networks as efficient bifunctional catalysts for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 827, 期 -, 页码 120-127

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.09.012

关键词

Electrocatalysis; Oxygen reduction reaction; Oxygen evolution reaction; One-step synthesis; Ir-Pd alloy

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2016R1D1A1B03930895]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a facile one-step process to synthesize highly interconnected nanoporous Ir-Pd alloys supported on carbon that exhibit excellent bifunctional electrocatalytic activities for both the oxygen reductio and oxygen evolution reactions with reasonable stability in alkaline electrolytes. Nanoporous Pd networks wi crystalline {111} faces were shown experimentally to serve mainly as active sites for the oxygen reductio reaction, whereas the Ir nanoparticles incorporated in the Pd nanoframe networks, where the optimized Ir:P ratio was 0.23:0.77 (n = 10), were responsible for the oxygen evolution reaction. Such three-dimensional ar chitectures provide a high density of active sites for the oxygen electrochemical reaction and facilitate electro transport. More importantly, the nanoporous Ir-Pd alloy nanocomposites exhibited similar stability for th oxygen reduction reaction but superior catalytic activity to the commercial Pd catalyst in alkaline solutions. In addition, the materials were also highly active for the oxygen evolution reaction, e.g., a small overpotential a 10 mA cm(-2) (1.628 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode), making it a high-performance bifunctional catalyst for both the oxygen electrochemical reaction. Rotating ring-disk electrode measurements showed that the oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions on the Ir-Pd catalysts proceeded predominantly through the desired 4-electron pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据