4.7 Article

Electro-Fenton and photoelectro-Fenton degradation of the antimicrobial sulfamethazine using a boron-doped diamond anode and an air-diffusion cathode

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 701, 期 -, 页码 7-13

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2013.04.027

关键词

Boron-doped diamond anode; Electro-Fenton; Oxidation products; Photoelectro-Fenton; Sulfamethazine

资金

  1. MICINN (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain) [CTQ 2010-16164/BQU]
  2. Feder funds
  3. MEC (Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia, Spain)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The degradation of sulfamethazine was tested by electro-Fenton (EF) and photoelectro-Fenton (PEF) using a cell with a boron-doped diamond (BDD) anode and an air-diffusion cathode. The main oxidant of this antimicrobial was hydroxyl radical ((OH)-O-center dot) formed at the BDD surface from water oxidation and in the bulk from Fenton's reaction between added Fe2+ and generated H2O2 at the cathode. Optimum conditions for both treatments were pH 3.0 and 0.5 mM Fe2+. PEF with UVA radiation was more powerful, allowing an almost total mineralization. EF also gave a large mineralization by the high oxidation ability of (OH)-O-center dot. The increase in current density enhanced the degradation rate of both processes, but consuming more specific charge and lowering mineralization current efficiency. Higher drug contents yielded greater efficiencies. Sulfamethazine decayed following a pseudo-first-order kinetics, more rapidly in PEF, and its constant rate rose at higher current density and lower drug content. 4,6-Dimethyl-2-pyrimidinamine, catechol, resorcinol, hydroquinone and p-benzoquinone were detected as aromatic intermediates. Oxalic, oxamic and mainly formic acids were accumulated in EF, disappearing more rapidly in PEF due to the additional photolysis of their Fe(III) complexes by UVA light. Organic N was mineralized as NH4 center dot ion, along with a smaller proportion of NO3- ion. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据