4.7 Article

Ordered mesoporous carbons (OMCs) as supports of electrocatalysts for direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs): Effect of the pore characteristics of OMCs on DMFCs

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 633, 期 1, 页码 1-6

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2009.04.013

关键词

Ordered mesoporous carbons; Soft template methods; Pore characteristics; Pt nanoparticles; Electrocatalytic activities

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50701023]
  2. Post-Doctoral Science Foundation of China [20060400283]
  3. Post-Doctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [2006277]
  4. Graduated Student Innovation Foundation of Jiangsu Province [CX07B_088z]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two types of ordered mesoporous carbons (OMCs-FT and OMCs-F) with different hexagonal pore frameworks were synthesized via two soft template routes. Structural characterizations revealed that OMCs-FT possessed broader mesopore range, more enhanced mesoporosity and higher surface area, compared with the counterpart of OMCs-F. In order to systematically investigate the relationship between the pore characteristics and electrochemical performances, two catalysts of OMCs-FT/Pt and OMCs-F/Pt were achieved by ethylene glycol-assisted reduction procedure. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements indicated that face-centered cubic Pt nanoparticles with an average size of 5.3 nm were homogeneously deposited on OMCs-FT while the mean size of 5.5 nm Pt nanoparticles had a relatively ransom dispersion on OMCs-F supports with some aggregations. The electrochemical results disclosed that OMCs-FT/Pt catalyst exhibited higher electrocatalytic activity and better stability than OMCs-F/Pt and commercially available E-TEK/Pt catalysts for methanol electro-oxidation. The broad mesopore range, enhanced mesoporosity and high surface area of OMCs-FT supports were considered to be the main reasons for its enhanced catalytic activity. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据