4.7 Article

Methylene blue as an indicator for sensitive electrochemical detection of adenosine based on aptamer switch

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 626, 期 1-2, 页码 1-5

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2008.08.008

关键词

Electrochemistry; Aptamer; Methylene blue; Displacement; Biosensor

资金

  1. major state basic research of China [2002CB713803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a simple, label-free and regenerative method was proposed to study the interaction between aptamer and small molecule by using methylene blue (MB+) as an electrochemical indicator. A thiolated capture probe containing twelve bases was firstly self-assembled on gold electrode by gold-sulfur affinity. Aptamer probe containing thirty two bases, which was designed to hybridize with capture DNA sequence and specifically recognize adenosine, was then immobilized on the electrode surface by hybridization reaction. MB+ was abundantly adsorbed on the aptamer probe by the specific interaction between MB+ and guanine base in aptamer probe. MB+-anchored aptamer probe can be forced to dissociate from the sensing interface after adenosine triggered structure switching of the aptamer. The peak current of MB+ linearly decreased with the concentration of adenosine over a range of 2 x 10 (8)- x 10 (6) M with a detection limit of 1 x 10 (8) M. In addition, we examined the selectivity of this electrochemical biosensor for cytidine, uridine and guanosine that belonged to the nucleosides family and possessed 1 similar structure with adenosine. The peak Current of MB+ slightly decreased even then 1 mM cytidine, uridine or guanosine was added to reaction cell for 2 h, which confirmed this biosensor had a good selectivity for adenosine. After each of detection, the electrode was immersed into aptamer solution for regeneration. The recovery of the electrochemical signal of MB+ indicated the sensor surface of electrode was successfully regenerated. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据