4.6 Article

Reducing Fertilization for Cut Roses: Effect on Crop Productivity and Twospotted Spider Mite Abundance, Distribution, and Management

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY
卷 102, 期 5, 页码 1896-1907

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1603/029.102.0521

关键词

Rosa hybrida; floriculture; Tetranychus urticae; integrated pest management; biological control

资金

  1. USDA-ARS Floriculture and Nursery Research Initiative [58-6204-0-0106, 58-6204-5-0033]
  2. K.M. Heinz Ornamental and Nursery Crop Endowment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fertilization reduction could be a useful pest management tactic for floriculture crops if it reduced pest populations with little loss in crop yield and quality. We evaluated the response of the twospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), to different fertilization levels for cut roses, Rosa hybrida L. 'Tropicana' and quantified fertilization effects on 1) management of T. urticae on roses, 2) abundance and distribution of T. urticae on roses, and 3) yield and quality of the cut rose crop. We tested two fertilization levels, 10% (15 ppm N) and 100% (150 ppm N) of the recommended level for commercial production, and three control methods: no control measure; a predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot; and a miticide, bifenazate. Combinations of both bottom up (fertilization) and top down (biological or chemical control) tactics provided a greater degree of T. urticae control than either tactic alone. Rose productivity was reduced with fertilization at 10% of the recommended level; therefore, we conducted studies with T. urticae on roses fertilized with 33% (50 ppm N), 50% (75 ppm N), and 100% (150 ppm N) of the recommended level. Mean numbers of T. urticae and T. urticae eggs per flower shoot were twice as high on roses fertilized with 100 versus 33% or 50% of the recommended level. Number of rose leaves and total leaf area infested by T. urticae were similar at all fertilization levels. Cut rose yield and marketability were not compromised on plants fertilized with 50% of the recommended level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据