4.7 Article

Diversity enhances community recovery, but not resistance, after drought

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
卷 98, 期 1, 页码 81-86

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01603.x

关键词

biodiversity; drought; ecosystem functioning; insurance hypothesis; resilience; stability

资金

  1. Dutch Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>1. There is growing concern that the current loss of biodiversity may negatively affect ecosystem functioning and stability. Although it has been shown that species loss may reduce biomass production and increase temporal variability, experimental evidence that species loss affects ecosystem resistance and resilience after perturbation is limited. 2. Here, we use the response of experimental plant communities - which differ in diversity - to a natural drought to disentangle the effects of diversity and biomass on resistance, recovery and resilience. 3. Resistance to drought decreased with diversity, but this pattern was highly dependent upon pre-drought biomass. When corrected for biomass, no relationship between diversity and resistance was observed: at each level of diversity, biomass production was reduced by approximately 30%. 4. In contrast, recovery (change in biomass production after drought) increased with diversity and was independent of biomass. Resilience (measured as the ratio of post- to pre-drought biomass) was similar at each level of diversity. 5. Synthesis. On the one hand, our results confirm earlier findings that a positive relationship between diversity and resistance is mainly driven by pre-perturbation performance rather than by diversity. However, the results also show that recovery after drought strongly increased with diversity, independent of performance. We conclude that it is this diversity-dependent recovery which allowed diverse, productive communities to reach the same level of resilience as less diverse (and productive) communities. This finding provides strong experimental evidence for the insurance hypothesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据