4.5 Article

Thermosensitive poly-(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide)-block-poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly-(D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) hydrogels for multi-drug delivery

期刊

JOURNAL OF DRUG TARGETING
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 669-677

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/1061186X.2014.931406

关键词

17-AAG; multi-drug delivery; ovarian cancer; paclitaxel; PLGA-b-PEG-b-PLGA; raamycin; regel

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R21 CA-161537]
  2. Carbone Cancer Center at University of Wisconsin-Madison

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A current treatment strategy for peritoneal ovarian cancer is a combination of peritoneal surgery and multi-drug-based chemotherapy that often involves intraperitoneal (IP) injection. A thermosensitive poly-(D, L-lactide-co-glycolide)-block-poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly-(D, L-lactide- co-glycolide) (PLGA-b-PEG-b-PLGA) hydrogel platform (thermogels) enabled gel loading of poorly work-soluble paclitaxel (cytotoxic agent), 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG, heat shock protein inhibitor), and rapamycin (mammalian target of rapamycin protein inhibitor). PLGA-b-PEG-b-PLGA thermogels (15%) carrying paclitaxel, 17-AAG, and rapamycin (named Triogel) made a successful transition from a free-flowing solution below ambient temperature to a gel depot at body temperature. Triogel gradually released paclitaxel, 17-AAG, and rapamycin at an equal release rate in response to the physical gel erosion. In an ES-2-luc ovarian cancer xenograft model, a single IP injection of Triogel (60, 60, and 30 mg/kg of paclitaxel, 17-AAG, and rapamycin, respectively) significantly reduced tumor burden and prolonged survival of ES-2-luc-bearing nude mice without notable systemic toxicity relative to those delivered by poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(D, L-lactic acid) (PEG-b-PLA) micelles in solution via IP or intravenous (IV) injection route. These results show a great potential of a biodegradable thermogel platform carrying multi-drugs for IP chemotherapy in peritoneal ovarian cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据