4.5 Article

Anionic polymer-coated lipoplex for safe gene delivery into tumor by systemic injection

期刊

JOURNAL OF DRUG TARGETING
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 639-647

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/1061186X.2013.789035

关键词

Anionic polymer; chondroitin sulfate; gene delivery; hyaluronan; liposome; poly-L-glutamic acid

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  2. Advanced research for medical products Mining Programme of the NIBIO
  3. Science Research Promotion Fund from the Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23790203] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we developed an anionic lipoplex by coating cationic lipoplex with anionic polymers such as hyaluronan (HA), chondroitin sulfate C (CS) and poly-L-glutamic acid (PLE) to deliver the plasmid DNA efficiently into the tumor by avoiding interaction with erythrocytes. The sizes of HA-, CS-and PLE-coated lipoplexes were similar to 200nm and the z-potentials were negative. CS-and PLE-coated lipoplexes did not induce agglutination after mixing with erythrocytes, but cationic and HA-coated lipoplexes exhibited agglutination. In terms of biodistribution and gene expression after intravenous administration, cationic and HA-coated lipoplexes largely accumulated and induced gene expression in the lung. In contrast, CS-and PLE-coated lipoplexes did not exhibit high gene expression in the lung and mainly accumulated in the liver. However, in tumor, differences in lipoplex accumulation and gene expression were not observed among the lipoplexes. In terms of toxicity after intravenous injection, CS-and PLE-coated lipoplexes did not increase tumor necrosis factor-a, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase concentrations in blood. From these findings, CS and PLE coatings for cationic lipoplex might produce safe systemic vectors, although they did not increase gene expression in tumor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据