4.5 Article

Bombesin peptide antagonist for target-selective delivery of liposomal doxorubicin on cancer cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF DRUG TARGETING
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 240-249

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/1061186X.2012.741138

关键词

Liposomes for drug delivery; bombesin peptide; doxorubicin delivery; anticancer efficacy; animal studies

资金

  1. Italian Minister of Research (MIUR) [FIRB RBRN07BMCT, PRIN E61J11000300001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This study addresses novel peptide modified liposomal doxorubicin to specifically target tissues overexpressing bombesin (BN) receptors. Methods: DOTA-(AEEA)(2)-peptides containing the [7-14]bombesin and the new BN-AA1 sequence have been synthesized to compare their binding properties and in serum stabilities. The amphiphilic peptide derivative (MonY-BN-AA1) containing BN-AA1, a hydrophobic moiety, polyethylenglycole (PEG), and diethylenetriaminepentaacetate (DTPA), has been synthesized. Liposomes have been obtained by mixing of MonY-BN-AA1 with 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC). Results: Both In-111 labeled peptide derivatives present nanomolar Kd to PC-3 cells. Lu-177 labeled peptide DOTA-(AEEA)(2)-BN-AA1 is very stable (half-life 414.1 h), while DOTA-(AEEA)(2)-BN, shows a half-life of 15.5 h. In vivo studies on the therapeutic efficacy of DSPC/MonY-BN-AA1/Dox in comparison to DSPC/MonY-BN/Dox, were performed in PC-3 xenograft bearing mice. Both formulations showed similar tumor growth inhibition (TGI) compared to control animals treated with non-targeted DSPC/Dox liposomes or saline solution. For DSPC/MonY-BN-AA1/Dox the maximum effect was observed 19 days after treatment. Conclusions: DSPC/MonY-BN-AA1/Dox nanovectors confirm the ability to selectively target and provide therapeutic efficacy in mice. The lack of receptor activation and possible acute biological side effects provided by using the AA1 antagonist bombesin sequence should provide safe working conditions for further development of this class of drug delivery vehicles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据