4.5 Article

Urokinase-plasminogen-activator sensitive polymeric photosensitizer prodrugs: design, synthesis and in vitro evaluation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1773-2247(09)50002-0

关键词

Protease-sensitive prodrugs; Photodynamic therapy; Urokinase plasminogen activator

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [205320-112234, 205320-122144]
  2. Oncosuisse [OCS-01948-08-2006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymeric photosensitizer-prodrugs (PPPs) to be selectively activated by urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) have been developed. They are composed of uPA-cleavable photosensitizer-peptide-conjugates covalently attached to a poly-lysine backbone (25 kDa). Phototoxicity of PPPs is efficiently reduced by energy transfer between closely positioned photosensitizer (PSs) on the polymeric backbone. Enzymatic cleavage by uPA, a serine protease that is up-regulated in certain types of cancer, leads to the release of PS-peptidyl-fragments and restoration of phototoxicity. In the current study, conjugates with different epsilon-lysine side chain modifications of the polymer-backbone were enzymatic cleavage by uPA. Based on these in vitro results and a cell screening experiment for photo- and dark toxicity, two compounds. PEG20-N-uPA-PPP and N-uPA-PPP, were selected as the most promising candidates for further evaluation in two uPA-expressing cell lines, DU-145 and PC-3. Here, the pegylated compound PEG20-N-uPA-PPP showed enhanced selective prodrug activation by uPA in comparison to N-uPA-PPP, pinpointing the need for prolonged extracellular residence time of uPA-sensitive prodrugs. In preliminary PDT-experiments, a dose-dependent phototoxic effect of this compound was found in both tested cell lines. In conclusion, this study highlights the fact that backbone substitution units may impact not only photochemical and physiochemical properties of the PPPs, but play an important role for cellular prodrug localization and thus site selective enzymatic activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据