4.8 Article

REV7 is essential for DNA damage tolerance via two REV3L binding sites in mammalian DNA polymerase ζ

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 1000-1011

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1385

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) from the National Cancer Institute [CA132840, CA09717, T32 CA09480]
  2. M.D. Anderson Research Trust
  3. Grady F. Saunders Ph.D. Distinguished Research Professorship
  4. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RP130297]
  5. Research Training Award from the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RP140106]
  6. CPRIT Core Facility Support [RP120348]
  7. NIH Cancer Center Support Grant [P30-CA016672]
  8. Physicians Referral Service, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA polymerase zeta (pol zeta) is exceptionally important for controlling mutagenesis and genetic instability. REV3L comprises the catalytic subunit, while REV7 (MAD2L2) is considered an accessory subunit. However, it has not been established that the role of REV7 in DNA damage tolerance is necessarily connected with mammalian pol zeta, and there is accumulating evidence that REV7 and REV3L have independent functions. Analysis of pol zeta has been hampered by difficulties in expression of REV3L in mammalian cells, and lack of a functional complementation system. Here, we report that REV7 interacts with full-length REV3L in vivo and we identify a new conserved REV7 interaction site in human REV3L (residues 1993-2003), distinct from the known binding site (residues 1877-1887). Mutation of both REV7-binding sites eliminates the REV3L-REV7 interaction. In vivo complementation shows that both REV7-binding sites in REV3L are necessary for preventing spontaneous chromosome breaks and conferring resistance to UV radiation and cisplatin. This demonstrates a damage-specific function of REV7 in pol zeta, in contrast to the distinct roles of REV3L and REV7 in primary cell viability and embryogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据