4.4 Article

Differential gene and protein expression in primary gastric carcinomas and their lymph node metastases as revealed by combined cDNA microarray and tissue microarray analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 167-175

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2010.00432.x

关键词

CAII; CTTN; gastric carcinoma; IGFBP4; lymph node metastasis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30572030, 30772116]
  2. Construct Program of Key Disciplines in Hunan Province
  3. Chenzhou Bureau of Scientific and Technical [2008gl15]
  4. Key Disciplines in Hunan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the molecular events of lymph node metastasis of human gastric carcinoma. METHODS: The gene expression profile of five matched primary gastric carcinomas and their lymph node metastases was analyzed by complementary DNA (cDNA) microarray. Differential genes were identified in the metastatic and corresponding primary tumor pairs. Among the differentially expressed genes, carbonic anhydrase II (CAII) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 4 (IGFBP 4) genes were detected by RT-PCR. CTTN protein expression was examined by tissue microarray. RESULTS: There was a high expression (over twofold) of 44 genes and a low expression (under twofold) of 32 genes in lymph node metastasis compared with primary gastric carcinoma, respectively. CAII mRNA was downregulated and IGFBP 4 mRNA was upregulated in paired lymph node metastases of gastric carcinomas. The overexpression of CTTN protein was related to the lymph node metastasis and the clinical stage of gastric carcinomas. CONCLUSION: This study showed that there is a low expression of genes relative to growth signal and immune response in lymph node metastases, and a high expression of genes relative to growth factor, cell cycle, cell motility and adhesion in lymph node metastases compared with primary gastric carcinomas. The expression of CTTN was related to the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据