4.8 Article

Binding dynamics of a monomeric SSB protein to DNA: a single-molecule multi-process approach

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1225

关键词

-

资金

  1. People Programme of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme [REA 334496]
  2. Leonardo da Vinci European Union Programme
  3. Wellcome Trust [099149/Z/12/Z, 091825/Z/10/Z]
  4. Wellcome Trust
  5. University of St Andrews
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1100198] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSBs) are ubiquitous across all organisms and are characterized by the presence of an OB (oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide/oligopeptide) binding motif to recognize single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Despite their critical role in genome maintenance, our knowledge about SSB function is limited to proteins containing multiple OB-domains and little is known about single OB-folds interacting with ssDNA. Sulfolobus solfataricus SSB (SsoSSB) contains a single OB-fold and being the simplest representative of the SSB-family may serve as a model to understand fundamental aspects of SSB: DNA interactions. Here, we introduce a novel approach based on the competition between Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET), protein-induced fluorescence enhancement (PIFE) and quenching to dissect SsoSSB binding dynamics at single-monomer resolution. We demonstrate that SsoSSB follows a monomer-by-monomer binding mechanism that involves a positive-cooperativity component between adjacent monomers. We found that SsoSSB dynamic behaviour is closer to that of Replication Protein A than to Escherichia coli SSB; a feature that might be inherited from the structural analogies of their DNA-binding domains. We hypothesize that SsoSSB has developed a balance between high-density binding and a highly dynamic interaction with ssDNA to ensure efficient protection of the genome but still allow access to ssDNA during vital cellular processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据