4.8 Article

FANCD2 and REV1 cooperate in the protection of nascent DNA strands in response to replication stress

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 17, 页码 8325-8339

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv737

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese National 973 Project [2013CB945000, 2011CB944302, 2012CB944702, 2011CB965003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31471331, 31170730, 81371415, 81101489]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the CAS [XDB14030302]
  4. CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams
  5. State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

REV1 is a eukaryotic member of the Y-family of DNA polymerases involved in translesion DNA synthesis and genome mutagenesis. Recently, REV1 is also found to function in homologous recombination. However, it remains unclear how REV1 is recruited to the sites where homologous recombination is processed. Here, we report that loss of mammalian REV1 results in a specific defect in replication-associated gene conversion. We found that REV1 is targeted to laser-induced DNA damage stripes in a manner dependent on its ubiquitin-binding motifs, on RAD18, and on monoubiquitinated FANCD2 (FANCD2-mUb) that associates with REV1. Expression of a FANCD2-Ub chimeric protein in RAD18-depleted cells enhances REV1 assembly at laser-damaged sites, suggesting that FANCD2-mUb functions downstream of RAD18 to recruit REV1 to DNA breaks. Consistent with this suggestion we found that REV1 and FANCD2 are epistatic with respect to sensitivity to the double-strand break-inducer camptothecin. REV1 enrichment at DNA damage stripes also partially depends on BRCA1 and BRCA2, components of the FANCD2/BRCA supercomplex. Intriguingly, analogous to FANCD2-mUb and BRCA1/BRCA2, REV1 plays an unexpected role in protecting nascent replication tracts from degradation by stabilizing RAD51 filaments. Collectively these data suggest that REV1 plays multiple roles at stalled replication forks in response to replication stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据