4.8 Article

On the mechanism of RNA phosphodiester backbone cleavage in the absence of solvent

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 10, 页码 5171-5181

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv288

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [Y372, P27347, I1040, P21641]
  2. National Science Foundation [OISE-0730072, CHE-1409420]
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [Y 372, P 27347, I 1040] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Division Of Chemistry
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1409420] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I1040, P27347] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ribonucleic acid (RNA) modifications play an important role in the regulation of gene expression and the development of RNA-based therapeutics, but their identification, localization and relative quantitation by conventional biochemical methods can be quite challenging. As a promising alternative, mass spectrometry (MS) based approaches that involve RNA dissociation in 'top-down' strategies are currently being developed. For this purpose, it is essential to understand the dissociation mechanisms of unmodified and posttranscriptionally or synthetically modified RNA. Here, we have studied the effect of select nucleobase, ribose and backbone modifications on phosphodiester bond cleavage in collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) of positively and negatively charged RNA. We found that CAD of RNA is a stepwise reaction that is facilitated by, but does not require, the presence of positive charge. Preferred backbone cleavage next to adenosine and guanosine in CAD of (M+nH)(n+) and (M-nH)(n-) ions, respectively, is based on hydrogen bonding between nucleobase and phosphodiester moieties. Moreover, CAD of RNA involves an intermediate that is sufficiently stable to survive extension of the RNA structure and intramolecular proton redistribution according to simple Coulombic repulsion prior to backbone cleavage into c and y ions from phosphodiester bond cleavage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据