4.8 Article

Cap homeostasis is independent of poly(A) tail length

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 1, 页码 304-314

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1460

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM084177]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR-1105458, DMR-1410172]
  3. National Cancer Institute [T32 CA0093338]
  4. Pelotonia Postdoctoral Fellowship Award
  5. American Heart Association [13POST172700021]
  6. Ohio State University Center for RNA Biology Predoctoral Fellowship
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Materials Research [1410172] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cap homeostasis is a cyclical process of decapping and recapping that maintains the cap on a subset of the cytoplasmic transcriptome. Interfering with cytoplasmic capping results in the redistribution of target transcripts from polysomes to non-translating mRNPs, where they accumulate in an uncapped but nonetheless stable form. It is generally thought that decapping is preceded by shortening of the poly(A) tail to a length that can no longer support translation. Therefore recapped target transcripts would either have to undergo cytoplasmic polyadenylation or retain a reasonably long poly(A) tail if they are to return to the translating pool. In cells that are inhibited for cytoplasmic capping there is no change in the overall distribution of poly(A) lengths or in the elution profile of oligo(dT)-bound targets. Poly(A) tail lengths were similar for target mRNAs on polysomes or in non-translating mRNPs, and the presence of polyadenylated uncapped mRNA in mRNPs was confirmed by separation into capped and uncapped pools prior to assay. Finally, in silico analysis of cytoplasmic capping targets revealed significant correlations with genes encoding transcripts with uridylated or multiply modified 3' ends, and genes possessing multiple 3'-untranslated regions (UTRs) generated by alternative cleavage and polyadenylation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据