4.4 Article

Soluble Expression of (+)-γ-Lactamase in Bacillus subtilis for the Enantioselective Preparation of Abacavir Precursor

期刊

APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 176, 期 6, 页码 1687-1699

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-015-1670-7

关键词

gamma-Lactamase; Heterologous expression; Bacillus subtilis; Whole-cell biocatalysis; Enantioselective resolution

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB710800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21276112, 31401634]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [JUSRP51409B]
  4. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [111-2-06]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chiral Vince lactam (gamma-lactam) is an important precursor of many carbocyclic nucleoside analogues and pharmaceuticals. Here, a (+)-gamma-lactamase encoding gene delm from Delftia sp. CGMCC 5755 was identified through genome hunting. To achieve its soluble and functional expression, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis expression systems were introduced. Compared with E. coli system, recombinant (+)-gamma-lactamase showed improved protein solubility and catalytic activity in B. subtilis 168. Reaction conditions for enantioselective resolution of gamma-lactam were optimized to be at 30 A degrees C, pH 9.0, and 300 rpm when employing the recombinant B. subtilis 168/pMA5-delm whole cells. Kinetic analysis showed that the apparent V (max) and K (m) were 0.595 mmol/(min A center dot g(DCW)) and 378 mmol/L, respectively. No obvious substrate inhibition was observed. In a 500-mL reaction system, enantioselective resolution of 100 g/L gamma-lactam was achieved with 10 g/L dry cells, resulting in 55.2 % conversion and 99 % ee of (-)-gamma-lactam. All above suggested that recombinant B. subtilis 168/pMA5-delm could potentially be applied in the preparation of optically pure (-)-gamma-lactam.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据