4.8 Article

Structure and primase-mediated activation of a bacterial dodecameric replicative helicase

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 17, 页码 8564-8576

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv792

关键词

-

资金

  1. ATIP-Avenir program of CNRS
  2. fellowship Region Rhone-Alpes from the program CIBLE
  3. FRISBI [ANR-10-INSB- 05-02]
  4. GRAL within the Grenoble PSB [ANR-10-LABX-49-01]
  5. Rhone-Alpes Region
  6. Fondation Recherche Medicale (FRM)
  7. fonds FEDER
  8. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  9. CEA
  10. University of Grenoble, EMBL
  11. GIS-Infrastrutures en Biologie Sante et Agronomie (IBISA)
  12. CNRS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Replicative helicases are essential ATPases that unwind DNA to initiate chromosomal replication. While bacterial replicative DnaB helicases are hexameric, Helicobacter pylori DnaB (HpDnaB) was found to form double hexamers, similar to some archaeal and eukaryotic replicative helicases. Here we present a structural and functional analysis of HpDnaB protein during primosome formation. The crystal structure of the HpDnaB at 6.7 angstrom resolution reveals a dodecameric organization consisting of two hexamers assembled via their N-terminal rings in a stack-twisted mode. Using fluorescence anisotropy we show that HpDnaB dodecamer interacts with single-stranded DNA in the presence of ATP but has a low DNA unwinding activity. Multi-angle light scattering and small angle X-ray scattering demonstrate that interaction with the DnaG primase helicase-binding domain dissociates the helicase dodecamer into single ringed primosomes. Functional assays on the proteins and associated complexes indicate that these single ringed primosomes are the most active form of the helicase for ATP hydrolysis, DNA binding and unwinding. These findings shed light onto an activation mechanism of HpDnaB by the primase that might be relevant in other bacteria and possibly other organisms exploiting dodecameric helicases for DNA replication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据