4.6 Article

Influence of sensory neuropeptides on human cutaneous wound healing process

期刊

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL SCIENCE
卷 74, 期 3, 页码 193-203

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2014.02.001

关键词

Cutaneous wound healing; Neuropeptides; Sensory neurons

资金

  1. Fondation Le Lous (Dijon, France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Close interactions exist between primary sensory neurons of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) and skin cells. The PNS may be implicated in the modulation of different skin functions as wound healing. Objective: Study the influence of sensory neurons in human cutaneous wound healing. Methods: We incubated injured human skin explants either with rat primary sensory neurons from dorsal root ganglia (DRG) or different neuropeptides (vasoactive intestinal peptide or VIP, calcitonin gene-related peptide or CGRP, substance P or SP) at various concentrations. Then we evaluated their effects on the proliferative and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling phases, dermal fibroblasts adhesion and differentiation into myofibroblasts. Results: Thus, DRG and all studied neuromediators increased fibroblasts and keratinocytes proliferation and act on the expression ratio between collagen type I and type III in favor of collagen I, particularly between the 3rd and 7th day of culture. Furthermore, the enzymatic activities of matrix metalloprotesases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) were increased in the first days of wound healing process. Finally, the adhesion of human dermal fibroblasts and their differentiation into myofibroblasts were promoted after incubation with neuromediators. Interestingly, the most potent concentrations for each tested molecules, were the lowest concentrations, corresponding to physiological concentrations. Conclusion: Sensory neurons and their derived-neuropeptides are able to promote skin wound healing. (C) 2014 Japanese Society for Investigative Dermatology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据