4.6 Article

Decrease in circulating Th17 cells correlates with increased levels of CCL17, IgE and eosinophils in atopic dermatitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL SCIENCE
卷 61, 期 3, 页码 180-186

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2010.10.013

关键词

Atopic dermatitis; T cell subsets; Eosinophilia; IgE; CCL17

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labour, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Clinical significance of circulating CD4(+) T cell subsets, including T-helper (Th)1, Th2, Th17 and regulatory T (Treg) cells, in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) remains unclear. No previous studies have simultaneously evaluated the four T cell subset profiles in AD. Objective: The aim of the present study was to explore whether the percentage of these four subsets of CD4(+) T cells correlate to the severity parameters of AD patients. Methods: Intracellular expression of interferon (IFN)-gamma, interleukin (IL)-4, IL-17 and forkhead box P3 (Foxp3) in CD4(+) T cells was evaluated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from normal controls and patient with AD as well as with chronic eczema using a flow cytometer. Serum CCL17 levels were measured as an objective severity parameter of AD together with percentage of eosinophils and serum IgE levels. Results: In AD patients, the number of Th1 (IFN-gamma(+)) and Th17 (IL-17(+)) subsets was significantly decreased, but that of Th2 (IL-4(+)) and Treg (Foxp3(+)) subsets was similar to that of normal controls. The T cell subset profiles of patients with chronic eczema were not different with those of normal controls. The frequency of Th17cells, particularly that of the IFN-gamma(IL)-I-nega-17(+) subset, showed a significant negative correlation with CCL17, IgE and eosinophil levels in AD patients. This was, however, not the case in Th1, Th2 and Treg cells. Conclusion: Decreased circulating Th17 cells might contribute to activity of AD. (C) 2010 Japanese Society for Investigative Dermatology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据