4.6 Review

Dendritic cells as controllers of antigen-specific Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL SCIENCE
卷 54, 期 2, 页码 69-75

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2009.02.001

关键词

Dendritic cells; Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells

资金

  1. NIH [AI 051573]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [P01AI051573] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regulatory T cells (Treg) are a subpopulation of CD4(+) lymphocytes that maintain immunological self-tolerance in the periphery. Treg also regulate or suppress other classes of immune response such as allograft rejection, allergy, tumor immunity, and responses to microbes. Treg express the Foxp3 transcription factor and CD25, the high affinity interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R). Treg are divided into two types: naturally occurring Treg derived from thymus (natural Treg) and Treg induced from Foxp3(-) CD4(+) T cells in the periphery (induced Treg). It would be valuable to understand how to control the generation of antigen-specific Treg, which could also provide a new approach to treat autoimmunity, allergy or allograft rejection without suppressing immune responses to tumor and microbes. In this review, we will discuss the role of dendritic cells (DCs) in controlling antigen-specific natural Treg and induced Treg. Natural Treg are anergic upon T cell receptor stimulation generally, however, we found that the antigen-specific natural Treg can be expanded by antigen-presenting mature bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BM-DCs). Furthermore, recent studies showed that antigen-specific Treg can be induced from Foxp3(-)CD25(-)CD4(+)T cells by antigen-presenting DCs, particularly select subsets of DCs in the periphery. These findings need to be pursued to develop novel immune suppressive therapies using antigen-specific Treg educated by DCs. (C) 2009 Japanese Society for Investigative Dermatology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据