4.6 Review

Therapeutic siRNAs for dominant genetic skin disorders including pachyonychia congenita

期刊

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL SCIENCE
卷 51, 期 3, 页码 151-157

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2008.04.003

关键词

pachyonychia; congenita; keratin; genodermatoses; RNAi; siRNA; gene therapy

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0700314, G0802780] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [R43 AR055881, R43 AR055881-01] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Medical Research Council [G0700314] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0700314] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The field of science and medicine has experienced a flood of data and technology associated with the human genome project. Over 10,000 human diseases have been genetically defined, but little progress has been made with respect to the clinical application of this knowledge. A notable exception to this exists for pachyonychia congenita (PC), a rare, dominant-negative keratin disorder. The establishment of a non-profit organization, PC Project, has led to an unprecedented coalescence of patients, scientists, and physicians with a unified vision of developing novel therapeutics for PC. Utilizing the technological by-products of the human genome project, such as RNA interference (RNAi) and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR), physicians and scientists have collaborated to create a candidate siRNA therapeutic that selectively inhibits a mutant allele of KRT6A, the most commonly affected PC keratin. In vitro investigation of this siRNA demonstrates potent inhibition of the mutant allele and reversal of the cellular aggregation phenotype. In parallel, an allele-specific quantitative real-time RT-PCR assay has been developed callus samples in preparation for clinical trials. If clinical efficacy is ultimately demonstrated, this first-in-skin siRNA may herald a paradigm shift in the treatment of dominant-negative genetic disorders. (c) 2008 Japanese Society for Investigative Dermatology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据