4.8 Article

Nuclear pore components affect distinct stages of intron-containing gene expression

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 8, 页码 4249-4261

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv280

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNRS, Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  2. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer [Comite d'Ile de France]
  3. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  4. Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  5. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer
  6. CNRS/Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several nuclear pore-associated factors, including the SUMO-protease Ulp1, have been proposed to prevent the export of intron-containing messenger ribonucleoparticles (mRNPs) in yeast. However, the molecular mechanisms of this nuclear pore-dependent mRNA quality control, including the sumoylated targets of Ulp1, have remained unidentified. Here, we demonstrate that the apparent 'premRNA leakage' phenotype arising upon ULP1 inactivation is shared by sumoylation mutants of the THO complex, an early mRNP biogenesis factor. Importantly, we establish that alteration of THO complex activity differentially impairs the expression of intronless and intron-containing reporter genes, rather than triggering bona fide 'pre-mRNA leakage'. Indeed, we show that the presence of introns within THO target genes attenuates the effect of THO inactivation on their transcription. Epistasis analyses further clarify that different nuclear pore components influence intron-containing gene expression at distinct stages. Ulp1, whose maintenance at nuclear pores depends on the Nup84 complex, impacts on THO-dependent gene expression, whereas the nuclear basket-associated Mlp1/Pml39 proteins prevent pre-mRNA export at a later stage, contributing to mRNA quality control. Our study thus highlights the multiplicity of mechanisms by which nuclear pores contribute to gene expression, and further provides the first evidence that intronic sequences can alleviate early mRNP biogenesis defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据