4.6 Article

Effect of fibre post length and adhesive strategy on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading

期刊

JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
卷 40, 期 4, 页码 312-321

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.006

关键词

Fibre posts; Post length; Adhesive cements; Fatigue; Fracture resistance

资金

  1. Fund for Research Flanders [F.W.O.-G.0281.05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of the length of fibre-posts(1) and type of adhesive cement(2) on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, after fatigue loading. Methods: Eighty extracted upper pre-molars were sectioned at the CEJ and endodontically treated. After 24 h of water storage at 37 degrees C, RelyX Posts (3M-ESPE) were cemented with Panavia F 2.0 (Kuraray) or RelyX Unicem (3M-ESPE). A standardized composite core was built. Specimens were divided into four groups depending on the post-core ratio: (A) 2/1 (control); (B) 3/2; (C) 1/1 (small diameter); (D) 1/1(large diameter) and submitted to 1,200,000 cycles using a chewing simulator (Willytech). Immediately afterwards, all specimens that survived fatigue loading were fractured using a universal loading device (Micro-tester, Instron). Data were analysed with ANOVA. Results: Four percent of the specimens failed during fatigue loading. The length of the post into the root affected the fracture resistance. The statistical outcome varied according to the inclusion of specimens failed during fatigue loading. However, the control group always had the lowest fracture resistance. The type of adhesive cement did not affect the fracture resistance. A prevalence of not-repairable failures was observed in specimens restored with the longest posts, whilst shorter posts led to more repairable failures. Conclusions: Shortening the post length and the ensuing preservation of more tooth structure, offer the potential for reparability through an in-built fail safe mechanism and may thus reduce the occurrence of catastrophic failures. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据