4.2 Article

GENERATION OF GRAPHITE PARTICLES BY SLIDING ABRASION AND THEIR CHARACTERIZATION

期刊

NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 189, 期 3, 页码 241-257

出版社

AMER NUCLEAR SOC
DOI: 10.13182/NT14-25

关键词

graphite dust; abrasion; graphite particle characterization

资金

  1. Nuclear Energy Initiative (NERI-C) of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG07-07IDI4892, 08-043]
  2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Characterization of graphite particles (dust) produced by abrasion that would occur in a pebble bed reactor is of interest for reasons of safety, operation, and maintenance. To better understand this abrasion and particle generation, we have built a test apparatus to produce particles by sliding abrasion in a 1% to 5% relative humidity air environment. We have used a commercial-grade graphite in our experiments and have generated size distributions for the abraded particles. We have also fit lognormal functions to those size distributions (for use in computer codes); determined particle shapes; measured temperature and humidity during the tests; measured and calculated wear rates; and measured the surface roughness of both pretest and posttest samples, particle surface areas, pore volumes, and pore volume distributions of particles produced during abrasion of graphite surfaces under different loadings and sliding speeds. The experiments showed that as loading (analogous to pebble depth in the reactor) and sliding speed increase, so do the wear rates and numbers of particles produced, while surface roughness decreases, increases, and then decreases. Brunauer-Emmett-Teller measurements show that abrasion increases surface area from 0.583 m(2)/g in the bulk material to 555 m(2)/g in material abraded at high loading and high sliding speed. Wear rates range from 0.005 to 0.991 g/m per contact site. The size of the particles observed was <4000 nm. In all, our research shows that pebble abrasion is a complex process that is not constant during operation and thus should be considered for future work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据