4.7 Article

Oral Health and Cancer, Cardiovascular, and Respiratory Mortality of Japanese

期刊

JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH
卷 90, 期 9, 页码 1129-1135

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0022034511414423

关键词

cardiovascular disease(s); epidemiology; dental public health; cancer; respiratory disease; cohort study

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science, and Technology, Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [22390400, 22592327]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22390400, 22592327] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and respiratory disease are major causes of death in developed countries. No study has simultaneously compared the contribution of oral health with these major causes of death. This study examined the association between oral health and cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and respiratory mortality among older Japanese. Self-administered questionnaires were mailed to participants in the Aichi Gerontological Evaluation Study (AGES) Project in 2003. Mortality data were analyzed for 4425 respondents. Three categories of oral health were used: 20 or more teeth, 19 or fewer teeth and eat everything, 19 or fewer teeth and eating difficulty. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), self-rated health, present illness, exercise, smoking, alcohol, education, and income were used as covariates. During 4.28 years' follow-up, 410 people died, 159 from cancer, 108 of cardiovascular diseases, and 58 of respiratory disease. Multivariate adjusted Cox proportional hazard models showed that, compared with the respondents with 20 or more teeth, respondents with 19 or fewer teeth and with eating difficulty had a 1.83 and 1.85 times higher hazard ratio for cardiovascular disease mortality and respiratory disease mortality, respectively. There was no significant association with cancer mortality. Oral health predicted cardiovascular and respiratory disease mortality but not cancer mortality in older Japanese.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据