4.7 Article

CCR5 Mediates Pro-osteoclastic and Osteoclastogenic Leukocyte Chemoattraction

期刊

JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH
卷 90, 期 5, 页码 632-637

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0022034510395021

关键词

CCR5; bone resorption; inflammation; chemotaxis; periodontal disease

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo-FAPESP [06/00534-1, 06/04949-1, 07/0019-4, 08/11174-1]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [08/11174-1, 06/04949-1] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Periodontal disease (PD) progression involves the selective leukocyte infiltration into periodontium, supposedly mediated by the chemokine/chemokine receptor system. In this study, we investigated the role of chemokine receptor CCR5 in the immunoregulation of experimental PD in C57BL/6 (WT) and CCR5KO mice. Aggregatibacter actinomycetem comitans infection triggered the chemoattraction of distinct CCR5+ leukocyte subpopulations (determined by flow cytometry): CCR5+F4/80+ leukocytes, which co-express CD14, CCR2, TNF-alpha, and IL-1 beta, indicative of activated macrophages; and CCR5+CD4+ cells, which co-express CXCR3, IFN-gamma, and RANKL, indicative of Th1 lymphocytes, therefore comprising pro-osteoclastic and osteoclastogenic cell subsets, respectively. CCR5KO mice presented a lower PD severity (lower inflammation and alveolar bone loss) when compared with the WT strain, since the migration of F4/80+, TNF-alpha+, CD4+, and RANKL+ cells specifically decreased due to the lack of CCR5. Also, ELISA analysis demonstrated that the production of TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IFN-gamma, and RANKL in periodontal tissues was significantly decreased in the CCR5KO strain. The periodontal bacterial load and antimicrobial patterns were unaltered in CCR5KO mice. Our results demonstrate that the chemokine receptor is involved in the migration of distinct leukocyte subpopulations throughout experimental PD, being a potential target for therapeutic intervention in PD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据