4.7 Article

Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 by spray-drying using sweet whey and skim milk as encapsulating materials

期刊

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
卷 97, 期 4, 页码 1991-1998

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-7463

关键词

probiotic; spray-drying; microencapsulation; gastrointestinal simulation

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES, Brasilia, DF, Brazil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of encapsulating material on encapsulation yield, resistance to passage through simulated gastrointestinal conditions, and viability of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 during storage. Microparticles were produced from reconstituted sweet whey or skim milk (30% total solids) inoculated with a suspension of L. acidophilus La-5 (1% vol/vol) and subjected to spray-drying at inlet and outlet temperatures of 180 degrees C and 85 to 95 degrees C, respectively. The samples were packed, vacuum-sealed, and stored at 4 degrees C and 25 degrees C. Encapsulation yield, moisture content, and resistance of microencapsulated L. acidophilus La-5 compared with free cells (control) during exposure to in vitro gastrointestinal conditions (pH 2.0 and 7.0) were evaluated. Viability was assessed after 0, 7, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 d of storage. The experiments were repeated 3 times and data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey test for the comparison between means. The encapsulating material did not significantly affect encapsulation yield, average diameter, or moisture of the particles, which averaged 76.58 +/- 4.72%, 12.94 +/- 0.78 mu m, and 4.53 +/- 0.32%, respectively. Both microparticle types were effective in protecting the probiotic during gastrointestinal simulation, and the skim milk microparticles favored an increase in viability of L. acidophilus La-5. Regardless of the encapsulating material and temperature of storage, viability of the microencapsulated L. acidophilus La-5 decreased on average 0.43 log cfu/g at the end of 90 d of storage, remaining higher than 10(6) cfu/g.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据