4.1 Article

Increased 18F-FDG uptake suggests synovial inflammatory reaction with osteoarthritis: preliminary in-vivo results in humans

期刊

NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 36, 期 12, 页码 1215-1219

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000376

关键词

F-18-FDG uptake; osteoarthritis; pathophysiology; synovial tissue

资金

  1. NIH [R01-DK063579-04, R01-AR048241]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective The aim of this prospective study was to compare the metabolic activity of the knee joints of a group of patients with painful knees clinically (such as recurrent joint pain, joint instability, and functional limitations) consistent with osteoarthritis and those of another group of patients without such complaints, using [F-18]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (F-18-FDG)-PET imaging. Methods A total of 97 patients who participated in either painful joint prosthesis or diabetic foot research studies involving F-18-FDG-PET scans were asked to complete a knee pain questionnaire. The patients were asked whether they experienced pain in any joint, and if so, which joints were affected. Results A total of 18 knee joints without prosthesis were reported to be painful. The maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of the middle joint space and lateral synovial tissue of these 18 knees were measured and compared with those of a set of patients with control asymptomatic knees. The average SUVmax of the middle part of the joint space in the painful knees was 1.350.59 compared with an average SUVmax value of 0.86 +/- 0.14 in the control group (P=0.0176). The average SUVmax of the synovium in the lateral part of the painful joints was 1.17 +/- 0.49 compared with 0.73 +/- 0.31 in the control group (P=0.0161). Conclusion These data indicate that increased F-18-FDG uptake is associated with knee pain in osteoarthritis patients and that there is a positive relationship between the two parameters. Copyright (C) 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据