4.1 Article

The differential diagnosis of CD8-positive (type D) lymphomatoid papulosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 88-100

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/cup.12243

关键词

CD30-positive lymphoproliferative disorder; CD8; lymphomatoid papulosis; lymphoproliferative disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundCutaneous CD8(+) CD30(+) lymphoproliferative lesions are difficult to classify and encompass entities that follow a benign course to overt lymphoma. In order to identify histopathologic criteria for lesions in this spectrum, a series of such cases was reviewed. MethodsTwenty-eight biopsies from 27 patients with CD8(+) CD30(+) cutaneous lymphoid proliferations were evaluated. ResultsSeventeen cases were classified as lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) type D', eight as cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (C-ALCL) and two as CD8(+) mycosis fungoides (MF) with CD30 expression. Features of LyP included spongiosis and/or parakeratosis (90%), epidermotropism by large lymphocytes (90%), with (80%) or without (10%) small lymphocytes; wedge-shaped infiltrate (70%) with perivascular (100%) and interstitial (80%) pattern; and relative uniformity of CD30(+) large atypical cells (90%). C-ALCL was characterized by ulceration (63%), epidermotropism restricted to small lymphocytes (100%), marked density (63%) and pleomorphism (62%) of CD30(+) large atypical cells, and at least focal extension of infiltrate to subcutaneous tissue (88%). CD8(+) CD30(+) MF had vacuolar interface change and a lichenoid pattern (100%). ConclusionsWe concur with previous authors that distinction of CD8(+) LyP from lymphoma in its differential diagnosis is difficult based on histopathology alone. Nonetheless, we propose that certain histopathologic clues may be helpful in this differential diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据