4.5 Article

Effect of novel consolidants on mechanical and absorption properties of deteriorated wood by insect attack

期刊

JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 195-203

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2011.09.007

关键词

Wood consolidation; Impregnation; Mechanical properties; Water absorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of chemical treatments based on novel organic products on the consolidation of deteriorated wood by insect attack was evaluated on two hardwoods and one softwood: fir (Abies alba), beech (Fagus sylvatica) and deciduous oak (Quercus sp.). Degraded and intact specimens of the three wood species were impregnated with two different chemical treatments aimed to verify the potential synergic action of the novel products on wood. Then, the specimens were subjected to bending, compression parallel to the grain, impact, hardness and water absorption tests. Untreated specimens of the same botanical species, both degraded and non-degraded, were examined for comparison purposes. The experimental results showed a different effectiveness of the proposed chemical treatments to improve the mechanical and absorption properties of degraded wood. The most effective treatment was the one assuming the concurrent use of the studied novel consolidants. The species more susceptible of the enhancement in mechanical properties were fir and beech. The observed differentiations were most likely caused by the different structure of the botanical species considered, leading to a consequent different product penetration in the wood structure. The dimensional stability in terms of water repellent and antiswelling efficiency, after a three-month immersion in deionized water, was found to improve in all the treated wood specimens. Overall, experimental results showed that the impact of the chemical treatments was higher on degraded samples than on intact ones. (C) 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据