4.4 Article

Preparation and characterization of superfine ammonium perchlorate (AP) crystals through ceramic membrane anti-solvent crystallization

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH
卷 311, 期 21, 页码 4575-4580

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.06.008

关键词

Crystal structure; Growth from solutions; Ammonium perchlorate (AP); Ceramic membrane anti-solvent crystallization (CMASC)

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [50702025]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [08KJB430009]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu province [BK2009473]
  4. Start up Foundation for Advanced Talents of Nanjing Normal University [2008103XGQ0051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a novel ceramic membrane anti-solvent crystallization (CMASC) method was proposed for the safe and rapid preparation ammonium perchlorate (AP) crystals, in which the acetone and ethyl acetate were chosen as solvent and anti-solvent, respectively. Comparing with the conventional liquid anti-solvent crystallization (LASC), CMASC which successfully introduces ceramic membrane with regular pore structure to the LASC as feeding medium, is favorable to control the rate of feeding rate and, therefore, to obtain size and morphology controllable AP. Several kinds of micro-sized AP particles with different morphology were obtained including polyhedral-like, quadrate-like to rod-like. The effect of processing parameters on the crystal size and shape of AP crystals such as volume ratio of anti-solvent to solvent, feeding pressure and crystallization temperature were investigated. It is found that higher volume ratio of anti-solvent to solvent, higher feeding pressure and higher temperature result in smaller particle size. Scaning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were used to characterize the resulting AP crystals. The nucleation and growth kinetic of the resulting AP crystals were also discussed. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据