4.1 Article

CARCINUS MAENAS (LINNAEUS, 1758) IN TWO NEW HAMPSHIRE ESTUARIES. PART 2: ASSESSMENT OF AVERAGE INTERMOLT PERIOD

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 339-347

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1163/1937240X-00002145

关键词

green crab; mating; molt; Munsell color charts; photoperiod; reproductive strategies

资金

  1. New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services' Coastal Program
  2. University of New Hampshire Graduate School
  3. University of New Hampshire Marine Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green crabs, Carcinus maenas (Linnaeus, 1758), were sampled from two New Hampshire estuaries, Hampton-Seabrook Estuary (HSE) and Great Bay Estuary (GBE), over the course of a one year field season (Nov. 2009-Oct. 2010) in order to determine the timing of molt cycles and egg-bearing periods expressed by both populations. Average timing of population molt was assessed by length of average intermolt period, which was estimated based on the color of the ventral side of the crab using the Munsell paint color charts, 40 hue edn. Crabs in both estuaries appeared to be on a simultaneous molting schedule centered around the month of June. Females experienced a single population-wide molt beginning in June and completed by November. Males experienced two population-wide molts starting in April and November that were both completed by June. Regressions between color variables and crab size or distance from the mouth of the estuary (alpha = 0.05) revealed no statistically significant correlations. Photoperiod (day-length) appeared to be the most important environmental cue for green crab molting and reproduction. Berried females were captured from January until November, with peak catch occurring in May. These results suggest that green crabs in both estuaries experience a single summer breeding season between June and November, which coincides with a period of relatively lower foraging activity as compared to the spring and fall months.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据