4.6 Article

The impact of preoperative steroid use on short-term outcomes following surgery for inflammatory bowel disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS
卷 8, 期 12, 页码 1661-1667

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.crohns.2014.07.007

关键词

Crohn's disease; Corticosteroids; Inflammatory bowel disease; Postoperative complications; Surgery; Ulcerative colitis

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are frequently treated with steroids prior to surgery. We characterized the association between preoperative steroid use and postoperative complications in a large prospective cohort. Methods: We identified patients who underwent major IBD-related abdominal surgery in the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) between 2005 and 2012. We compared the risk of postoperative complications and 30-day mortality between preoperative steroid users and non-users. Results: We identified 8260 Crohn's disease (CD) and 7235 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who underwent major abdominal surgery. Preoperative steroid use was associated with higher risk of postoperative complications, excluding death, in both CD (22.6% vs. 18.5%, P <0.0001) and UC (30.1% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.0001). The adjusted odds ratio for any postoperative complication associated with steroids was 1.26 (95% Cl: 1.12-1.41) for CD and 1.44 (95% CI: 1.28-1.61) for UC. Infectious complications were more frequent with steroid use in both CD (15.2% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.004) and UC (19.4% vs. 15.6%, P < 0.0001), specifically intra-abdominal infections and sepsis. Steroid use was associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in both CD (OR, 1.66; 95% Cl: 1.17-2.35) and UC (OR, 2.66; 95% CI: 2.01-3.53). 30-day mortality did not differ among steroid users and non-users (6.8/1000 vs. 5.8/1000, P = 0.58 for CD; 13.5/1000 vs. 15.2/ 1000, P = 0.55 for UC).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据