4.6 Article

Emigration to western industrialized countries: A risk factor for developing inflammatory bowel disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 566-569

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.crohns.2011.05.009

关键词

Epidemiology; Emigration; Industrialized countries

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A higher incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in industrialized areas has been previously reported, but the effect of emigrating to western industrialized countries for a period of time and returning to the country of origin is unknown. Aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of emigrating to another country and returning to the place of origin on the risk of IBD. Methods: A prospective case-control study was performed. Inclusion criteria were all patients >18 years diagnosed with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in the last 10 years. Healthy, unrelated controls, matched by sex, age and smoking habits, with no family history of IBD were included. All patients and controls were interviewed and emigration was defined as living for at least one year in another country. Results: 242 consecutive patients with IBD (105 CD and 137 UC) and 242 controls were included. Patients who had previously emigrated developed more frequently IBD than controls (OR 1.93, 95%CI 1.19-3.15, p<0.01). Patients who emigrated to European countries developed more frequently IBD than controls (OR 1.91, 95%CI 1.07-3.47, p=0.02), but not those who had emigrated to Latin America (OR 1.48, 95%CI 0.67-3.27, p=0.32). Emigration plays a significant role in the development of UC (OR 2.24, 95%CI:1.29-3.88, p<0.01), but not in CD (OR 1.56, 95%IC:0.83-2.92, p=0.15). Conclusions: People who emigrate to westernised countries have a higher risk for developing IBD, especially UC. Environmental factors related with industrialization seem to play an important role in the pathogenesis of these diseases. (C) 2011 European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据