4.6 Article

Long-term outcome in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with intravenous cyclosporine A is determined by previous exposure to thiopurines

期刊

JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 398-404

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.crohns.2010.01.001

关键词

Active ulcerative colitis; Severe; Cyclosporine A; Thiopurines; Colectomy; Long-term outcome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aim: Rescue therapy with intravenous cyclosporine A (CsA) helps to avoid colectomy in a substantial proportion of patients with severe ulcerative colitis (UC) but the impact on long-term outcome remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to define predictive factors for colectomy in patients treated with intravenous CsA for severely active UC. Methods: A retrospective, single-center study with a minimum follow-up of 18 months was performed. Results: A total of 64 patients were evaluable (median age 33 years [range 17-80 years], female 54.7%). Median intravenous CsA dose was 4 mg/kg/day (range 2-5 mg/kg/day). After a median follow-up of 65 months (range 2-160 months), 19 patients (29.7%) underwent colectomy, 15 within 18 months. Of the various baseline parameters tested, only previous non-response to thiopurine treatment (p = 0.006) was associated with an increased risk of colectomy. During 18 months follow-up, thiopurine-naive patients receiving thiopurine maintenance therapy after intravenous CsA (32/64, 50.0%) underwent colectomy in 12.5% of cases. The colectomy rate was 27.3% among 22 patients previously non-responsive to thiopurines who continued treatment after intravenous CsA, compared to 50.0% in the 10 patients who discontinued thiopurines prior to intravenous CsA or who never received thiopurines (p = 0.037). Conclusions: The long-term colectomy rate after intravenous CsA in patients with severely active UC was relatively low in our series compared to the literature. Concomitant treatment with thiopurines was the only predictor for a reduced risk of colectomy. (C) 2010 European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据