4.5 Article

Administration of proton pump inhibitors in critically ill medical patients is associated with increased risk of developing Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.002

关键词

PPI; Gastrointestinal bleeding; Nosocomial pneumonia; CDAD; Stress ulcer; Sepsis

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [DFG Ta434/2-1, SFB/TRR57]
  2. Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) Aachen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) effectively prevent gastrointestinal bleedings in critically ill patients at the intensive care unit (ICU). In non-ICU hospitalized patients, PPI administration increases the risk of infectious complications, especially Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD); but no such data are available for the ICU setting. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective, observational, single-center analysis (1999-2010) including 3286 critically ill patients. Results: A total of 91.3% of patients received stress ulcer prophylaxis by PPI (55.6%), histamine 2 receptor antagonists (5.8%), sucralfate (10.1%), or combinations (19.8%). Only 29 (0.9%) of 3286 patients developed gastrointestinal bleedings during the course of ICU treatment, independent from the type of prophylaxis. The PPIs were not an independent risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia. One hundred and ten (3.3%) patients developed CDAD during the course of ICU treatment, which was associated with prolonged ICU stay and increased ICU mortality (odds ratio, 1.59). Similar to fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins, PPI was identified as an independent risk factor (odds ratio, 3.11) for developing CDAD at the ICU by multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Proton pump inhibitor therapy was an independent risk factor for CDAD in medical ICU patients. Instead of routine PPI use for bleeding prophylaxis, further trials should investigate risk-adjusted algorithms, balancing benefits, and threats of PPI medication. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据