4.5 Article

Ventricular dysfunction and dilation in severe sepsis and septic shock: Relation to endothelial function and mortality

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.06.017

关键词

Severe sepsis; Myocardial dysfunction; Endothelin 1; Prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate echocardiography-based indices of myocardial function and markers of vascular inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in the early phases of severe sepsis. Material and Methods: Forty-five adult patients (67% women; age 51 +/- 18 years; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Disease Classification System II score, 23 +/- 7) admitted to the intensive care unit up to 24 hours after fulfilling criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock were studied. Clinical, laboratorial (endothelin 1 [ET1], vascular cellular adhesion molecule 1), and echocardiographic data were collected within the first 24 hours and again 72 hours and 7 days after admission. Results: Intrahospital mortality was 33% (15 deaths). Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (LV ejection fraction <55%) was identified in 15 (33%) patients, whereas right ventricular (RV) dysfunction (RV tissue Doppler peak systolic velocity [RV-Sm] <12 cm/s) was present in 14 (30%) patients. LogET1 was increased in patients with LV dysfunction (2.3 +/- 0.6 vs 1.8 +/- 0.4 pg/mL; P = .01) and RV dysfunction (2.5 +/- 0.5 vs 1.8 +/- 0.4 pg/mL; P < .001) and had negative correlations with LV ejection fraction (r = -0.50; P = .002) and RV-Sm (r = -0.67; P < .001). Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, RV-Sm, and diastolic dysfunction were able to discriminate survivors from nonsurvivors, and the combination of these parameters identified groups of very low and high risk. Conclusion: Both LV and RV systolic dysfunctions are prevalent in severe sepsis, being directly associated with markers of endothelial dysfunction. Left ventricular nondilation, RV dysfunction, and diastolic dysfunction seem related to poor prognosis in this scenario. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据