4.5 Article

Ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients: A prospective cohort study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 422-430

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.11.011

关键词

ciprofloxacin; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics; pharmacology; intensive care; microbial sensitivity tests; area under curve; pharmacotherapy; fluoroquinolones

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Optimal dosing of antibiotics is important for efficacy and avoidance of resistance. fluoroquinolones are frequently used to treat severe infections in critically ill patients. We studied ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics after administration of 400 mg twice a day (bid) intravenously (IV). Material and methods: Serum concentrations were measured in 32 intensive care unit patients (age, 68.7 +/- 17.4 years; Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, 7.3 +/- 3.4). Blood samples were drawn at 7 time points after ciprofloxacm infusion. We evaluated whether areas under the curve (AUCs) exceeded minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/L by 125 times and peak concentrations (C-max) 10 x MIC (C-max/MIC > 10). Results: The AUC/MIC more than 125 was achieved in 100% for MIC 0.125. For MIC values 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0, results were 84%, 31% 3%, and 0%, respectively (P < .01). The C-max/MIC more than 10 for MIC values of 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 was realized in 100%. 97%, 69%, 25%, and 0%, respectively (P <.01). Female sex, SOFA(pulmonary) points, and SOFA(renal) points predicted higher AUC. Cumulative SOFA scores were most predictive of high AUCs. Conclusions: Ciprofloxacin 400 mg bid IV leads to inadequate AUC/MIC and C-max/MIC ratios in many cases. Effective killing concentrations were only achieved in pathogens with MIC less than 0.25. As bacteria in intensive care unit patients often exceed this threshold, we recommend to use higher doses of ciprofloxacin (1200 mg daily) to ensure optimal bacterial killing and avoid antibiotic resistance. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据